Search
We aim to lead in each practice and area of law we work in. Coming from in-depth understanding of the law and the industry, capitalizing on extensive experience, we provide hands-on advice that speaks the language of our client’s business. Whether in aviation, sales and distribution, antitrust, corporate and M&A, finance etc.
Protecting Your Privacy in Case of Search and/or Seizure of Your Electronic Device at the U.S. Border
By Whittier Law Group
U.S. citizens and Green Card holders returning to the United States are often surprised to learn that their constitutional rights—particularly concerning the search and seizure of electronic devices (cell phones, iPads, PCs, etc.)—are significantly limited at the border. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has broad authority under what’s known as the “border search exception” to the Fourth Amendment. This allows them to inspect luggage, personal items, and even electronic devices like cell phones without a warrant or probable cause.
However, this authority is not unlimited, and there are ways travelers can safeguard their privacy and respond effectively if their phone is seized.
The Legal Framework
The Supreme Court and various appellate courts have upheld CBP’s right to perform “routine” searches without suspicion. That said, federal courts have also recognized that highly intrusive or “advanced” searches of digital devices—especially those that bypass encryption or extract data—usually require at least “reasonable suspicion” (a lesser standard than probable cause) that the device contains evidence of a crime (see United States v. Ramirez, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128853, United States v. Jenkins, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 208134, House v. Napolitano, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42297). If you are asked by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to hand over your device for inspection, ask why, and ask whether or not the agent has any reasonable suspicion that your device contains evidence of a crime. The answer of the CBP agent could indicate in later legal proceedings, whether the search was routine, or advanced and requiring “reasonable suspicion” or even probable cause.
Search or Seizure
Under the border exceptions to searches and seizures referred to above, and pursuant to CBP Directive # 3340-049A, a traveler to the U.S. is required to present any electronic device to a CBP officer for inspection (i.e., a search) when requested. However, the officer is only entitled to access the information contained on the device which is not encrypted or password protected.
It is the right of every U.S. citizen to refuse to provide their password to the CBP agent and still retain the right to re-enter the country. However, a non-citizen, including a Green Card holder who withholds their passcode from the CBP, may be refused entry and have their electronic device seized for further investigation and analysis. If the traveler consents to have the CBP agent inspect the contents of their phone at the border, they can enter the passcode themselves without revealing the passcode to the agent. This compromise may avoid a possible seizure.
Unlike a basic search, a seizure occurs when the CBP agent requires that the traveler leave their electronic device at the border to be sent to another location, under CBP authority, for further inspection and possible recording of the information contained on the device.
In the case of seizure, the traveler should demand a receipt for all property taken and ask for the name and badge number of the lead officer and all other agents conducting the search and seizure. This will assist your lawyer to later locate who has the electronic device and take whatever legal measures are necessary to restore possession of the device to the owner, after 30 days.
What You Can Do to Protect Your Privacy
While you may be required to hand over your phone, you can take proactive steps to limit access to your private information:
If Your Device Is Seized
If CBP takes possession of your phone and you do not wish to provide the passcode:
Exercising your Constitutional Rights May Have Consequences
Refusing to comply with a lawful CBP request for your device passcode could lead to detention or prolonged questioning. While U.S. citizens cannot be denied reentry, refusal to cooperate could still complicate the return process. For Green Card holders, noncompliance might raise immigration concerns, especially if CBP alleges any connection to prohibited conduct. Therefore, permanent residents should always consult an attorney before traveling with electronic devises containing sensitive information.
But remember, you do have the right to refuse to give your passcode and if your device is seized it must be returned within 30 days, and no information may be removed from it without a lawful warrant, and the CBP cannot use the device to access your remote or Cloud stored information.
Also, if the CBP or other law enforcement agency seek to use information from your seized device against you, you have the legal right to seek a “suppression order” to prevent that information from being used.
Knowing your constitutional rights and exercising them may have short-term consequences and cause inconveniences, but in the medium-to-long-term, your very freedom from prosecution and incarceration may depend on your knowing and actively exercising these rights.
Final Thoughts
The law concerning digital privacy at the border is evolving. As legal challenges continue, future rulings may offer clearer protections. Until then, being informed, minimizing exposure, and respectfully asserting your rights remain your best defenses.
For assistance with border searches or recovering a seized phone, contact the Whittier Law Group (917-699-9197) for legal guidance tailored to your case.
The Links below contain further detailed information of CBP policies and procedures regarding the search and seizure of electronic devices:
https://www.cbp.gov/travel/cbp-search-authority/border-search-electronic-devices
https://www.dhs.gov/dhs-trip
Related Posts
27
How New U.S. Tariffs Are Reshaping Import Compliance: Legal Risks and Strategies for Importers
By Whittier Law Group — Business-Focused Trade Compliance AttorneysIntroduction: Why Importers Need Legal Guidance Now More Than EverThe U.S. government’s recent announcement of the “Liberation Day” tariffs has sent shockwaves through the global supply chain. With a new universal 10% tariff on most imports, a sharp increase to 125% tariffs on goods from China, and …
6
African Countries Can Avoid the Worst from Altering U.S. Trade Policies
African Countries Can Avoid the Worst from Altering U.S. Trade Policies – By Being Strategically Proactive African leaders are acutely aware that a second Donald Trump presidency could disrupt trade and investment on the continent. Given his track record of imposing tariffs and reshaping global trade dynamics, African companies must proactively seek private sector allies …
30
Unlocking the Power of Tether for U.S.-Africa-EU Trade
As global trade becomes more digital, businesses across Africa, the U.S., and the EU are looking for faster, more reliable ways to complete cross-border transactions. One of the most promising tools in this space is Tether (USDT)—a stablecoin pegged to the U.S. dollar that offers both speed and stability in international payments. But while the …
29
Business Arbitration Lawyer
Why You Need a Business Arbitration Lawyer Before Signing or Modifying Arbitration Clauses When it comes to resolving disputes in business transactions, arbitration is a common alternative to traditional litigation. It’s faster, more private, and often more cost-effective. But not all arbitration agreements are created equal—especially when parties attempt to modify the standard rules set …
3
Preparing Int’l Trade Clients for President-Elect Trump’s Proposed Chinese Tariffs
With President-elect Donald Trump signaling an aggressive stance on trade with China, including proposed tariffs as high as 45% on Chinese imports, international trade attorneys need to proactively prepare their clients for a rapidly evolving trade landscape. These proposals, aimed at addressing trade imbalances and alleged unfair trade practices, could significantly disrupt global supply chains, …